As a testament oliver to our progress, Freedom house recognized that opposition parties were able to organize freely during last years provincial elections. For this and other reasons, Freedom house upgraded Iraqs rating on political rights. We are striving for a society where grievances can be heard and differences can be resolved through open debate and peaceful protests. However, we cannot allow extremists to undermine our country by taking advantage of our democratic freedoms. Once it became clear that terrorists in Anbar were attempting to hijack the lawful demands of civilian protesters and infiltrating their protest camp in Ramadi to foment sectarian tensions, in addition to blocking the main highway to jordan and Syria for several months, we moved. We knew that given the opportunity to address their concerns peacefully, local leaders would reject those who preach divisiveness and practice violence. When security forces eventually moved to close down the camp, there was not a single instance of violence. As our past elections have shown, the overwhelming majority of Iraqis embrace ballots, not bullets. From our recent history, iraqis have concluded that no single faction — whether ethnic, religious, regional, or political — should dominate our country.
Our government has also sought to reinstate army and police officers who had been unfairly dismissed after the collapse of the former regime. We have held five rounds of reinstatements to encourage former officers to rejoin the security forces. Support for Iraqs security is still important — especially military equipment and intelligence cooperation, which allows us to track down and eliminate terrorist networks. We have also begun discussions with our American counterparts on resuming training for our counterterrorism forces. We are not asking for American foreign aid. Thanks to our rapidly growing economy, we are able and willing to pay for all the military equipment we need. That is why the Obama administration offered to sell us Apache helicopters, and we are grateful that Congress has now approved that sale. Social Inclusion, open, inclusive politics is an integral part of our security strategy. A society where every community has a voice and no one feels excluded will deny extremists the support they require for their for violent aims.
We are also empowering local tribesmen, who fight alongside Iraqi police forces, to help eradicate the scourge of al qaeda. We are providing these tribesmen with the weapons, money, and logistical support to take on the challenge — and where local forces require extra assistance, we have sent in special forces that are trained in counterterrorism operations. The national army is also pursuing terrorist camps in the remote desert areas of Anbar, in addition to securing our borders. We have also listened to the concerns of the local provincial council and have refrained from ordering the Army into Anbars towns. We know that al qaeda uses civilians as human shields — because of our desire to avoid civilian casualties, we have sought to empower local forces to tackle this threat from within. These operations may take time, but they are the surest way of reducing the suffering of local residents, who have endured much over the years, while ensuring that the security gains can be sustained and consolidated. That is why we plan to build upon our effort to incorporate the sons of Iraq movement into the security forces so that they can take primary responsibility for their own areas — and to eventually position Army units outside the provinces, as stipulated.
A for and against essay about the internet
We are pursuing a comprehensive, multifaceted strategy of constitutional governance, social inclusion, security operations, diplomatic outreach, and economic development to accomplish this. We want to work in partnership with the United States on all these efforts, especially as we move forward toward a crucial milestone in Iraqs progress from dictatorship to democracy — our fourth parliamentary elections since 2003. We are committed to conducting these elections by April 30, 2014, and to providing a secure environment across Iraq that will encourage voter participation, thereby enhancing the legitimacy of the democratically elected government and diminishing the appeal essay of the extremists. Al qaeda understands the importance of our elections, and so should Iraqis and Americans. By trying to sow disorder and chaos less than three months ahead of the vote, the terrorists are seeking to reignite divisions within Iraqi society and undermine our emerging democratic institutions. We cannot and will not allow this to happen. It is our duty to ensure that communities can exercise their right to vote freely without intimidation or fear.
Security Operations, winning the support of the people we defend is central to our strategy for defeating terrorism. Because al qaeda is targeting all Iraqis — whether Shiites, sunnis, kurds, or Turkmen, among other groups — we are seeking to unite all Iraqis against the forces of extremism. An effective counterterrorism strategy requires us to harness the full capacity of our security forces. Because of our outreach efforts, many sunni tribes and clans have been fighting alongside the security forces in Anbar, ninevah, and other troubled provinces. As during the American "surge" beginning in 2007, the security forces have the support of the sons of Iraq. These groups of local citizens — which started among the sunni tribes in Anbar province and expanded nationally — help to protect their communities by serving as auxiliary police forces.
Over the last decade, the Iraqi people and their elected leaders have learned many lessons. We understand that a purely military approach will not succeed in stopping terrorism, much less in healing the sectarian, ethnic, and regional rifts that are exploited by violent extremism. We also understand that terrorism is not solely an Iraqi problem but an international problem. Nowhere is this more evident than in the case of the syrian civil war: Time and again, i have cautioned against the spillover of terrorism from that conflict to our own country, and now it has happened. With logistical support from their bases in Syria, al qaeda and other extremist forces have re-established their presence in western Iraq and increasingly are able to send suicide bombers into our country to cause death, destruction, and disorder.
These groups have renewed their campaign to foment sectarian violence and have sought to drive a wedge between our people. The spillover from Syria is the most important factor in the upsurge of violence in Iraq over the past year. But make no mistake: What we are witnessing is not sectarian strife — it is indiscriminate slaughter. Al qaeda kills Shiites. Al qaeda kills Sunnis. And, on Christmas, the terrorists bombed Christian neighborhoods in Baghdad, murdering more than two dozen people on their holiest day. Because al qaeda believes in blowing people up, not in winning people over, it can be beaten, must be beaten, and will be beaten. Iraq has defeated al qaeda before, and we have a holistic strategy to defeat al qaeda again. We aim not only to defeat terrorists when we find them, but also to diminish the discontent on which they feed.
Lovecraft: Against the world, Against
Both the United States and Iraq, then, have much to gain by making the shared effort against our shared enemies. In order to defend and rebuild our country, iraq needs American equipment help and American know-how, as well as private investment internet in our own country and strategic coordination in our region. Such common efforts against common enemies in pursuit of common goals are the object of the Strategic Framework Agreement that the United States and Iraq signed before the withdrawal of American troops in 2011. Iraq is not a protectorate; we are a partner. Iraqis are grateful to the. Troops who served in our country, some of whom made the ultimate sacrifice. But today iraq is a sovereign country that does not need American boots on the ground. In that spirit of partnership, i want to share the thinking behind our efforts to defend our country against terrorism.
Therefore, we should think carefully about the advantages and drawbacks before purchasing a mobile phone, and ask ourselves why we need a mobile phone and whether we will be able to use it responsibly. Baghdad — when al qaeda and other terrorist groups attacked Anbar province in late december and temporarily took control of parts of the cities of Fallujah and Ramadi,. Secretary of State john Kerry said, "This is a fight that belongs to the Iraqis.". Indeed this is our fight. More than two years after American troops left Iraq, with violent extremist groups such as al qaeda resurgent, Iraq accepts that it is our responsibility to defeat them militarily, to isolate them politically, and to create the social and economic conditions that will deny them. While the battle against al qaeda in Anbar province is Iraqs fight, it is part of a larger struggle against terrorism that threatens our neighbors in the middle east and North Africa and also endangers the United States and the entire world community. The terrorism we face is transnational in nature, and defeating it will require international collaboration, including a strong partnership between the United States and Iraq. As President Barack Obama emphasized in his pdf State of the Union address, we need to work together as partners to "disrupt and disable" terrorist networks.
some people to give out radioactive waves and some scientists believe that this radioactivity can cause brain tumors or damage our ears. There is still no solid evidence to prove that mobile phones are safe to use. Another problem is that people can easily become addicted to mobile phones since they are now multi-purposed with different functions. The convenience of mobile phones can also cause a lot of problems such as cheating in tests as it is now easy for students to access the Internet at any time. People start to abuse mobile phones. This may affect the students at school as they may play games and send messages during lessons. Also, there are some places where there is no signal for the mobile phones so you can only make emergency calls, which is sometimes very inconvenient. In conclusion, i think that mobile phones are indispensable tools that we cannot live without, but we should avoid abusing them.
We use them very often. For example, when we are outdoors, where there are no telephones, we can use our handy mobile phone. Secondly, mobile phones enable us to call for help during times of way emergency. For instance, if you are involved in an accident or if you witness a crime taking place, you can call the police immediately using your mobile phone. There have been some cases in which the police made use of the victims' cell phones' networks to locate the kidnappers. Some people feel uncomfortable or handicapped without their mobiles as they have become a necessity in our daily lives. This is mainly due to the convenience of mobiles and their varied functions such as MP3 players, radios and games. Mobiles are not only a great time-saving device, but they are a source of entertainment too. On the other hand, there are disadvantages of using mobile phones, too.
Your ultimate weapon against writer's block kibin
Proszę o korektę jeżeli będzie potrzebna. Mobile Phones, mobile phones have become an indispensable part of our daily lives. Mobile phones play an important role in our daily lives. But why are they so oliver popular? Almost everyone owns a mobile phone nowadays as they think that it is an essential tool. People without a mobile phone are thought of as eccentric. There must be reasons why we have become so dependent on mobile phones. Firstly, they are portable. Therefore, it is convenient for us to carry mobile phones and keep in contact with others at any time.